As during his time in the Ohio Senate hard and came to be widely light on two issues women suffrage and the prohibition of alcohol we’re picking the wrong side would have damaged his presidential prospects in 1920 positions
P z is Q = p-Q and that’s the answer
Answer:
As the chief executive of our nation, I respectfully suggest that you unwittingly crush the spirit of freedom in Negroes by constantly urging forbearance and give hope to those pro-segregation leader
ssppgrade5.yolasite.com › res...PDF
Letter from Jackie Robinson on Civil Rights.
The main reason that Jackie Robinson has to write his letter to President Eisenhower is that he hopes that the president will take immediate action to curb segregation laws at the federal level.
Explanation:
17 million Negroes cannot do as you suggest and wait for the hearts of men to change. We want to enjoy now the rights that we feel we are entitled to as Americans. This we cannot do unless we pursue aggressively goals which all other Americans achieved over 150 years ago.
As the chief executive of our nation, I respectfully suggest that you unwittingly crush the spirit of freedom in Negroes by constantly urging forbearance and give hope to those pro-segregation leaders like Governor Faubus who would take from us even those freedoms we now enjoy. Your own experience with Governor Faubus is proof enough that forbearance and not eventual integration is the goal the pro-segregation leaders seek.
In my view, an unequivocal statement backed up by action such as you demonstrated you could take last fall in dealing with Governor Faubus if it became necessary, would let it be known that America is determined to provide—in the near future—for Negroes—the freedoms we are entitled to under the constitution.
Answer:
The British East India Company wins. Indians did not win due to power conflicts between Muslims and Hindus. It was the British rule over India.
Explanation:
Answer:
Fifth.
Explanation:
It is a fifth amendment in which protection is given to private property and due to this amendment, there is no right of government to seized any individual's property. So the fifth amendment provides protection to the owners of the property while on the other hand, first amendment provides protection of freedom and limited the influence of government on the citizens.
