I'm pretty sure the answer is the third one!
First of all i don’t think it’s your fault she’s always mad at you. don’t go and instantly blame yourself. maybe talk to her? ask her why she says these things and ask where she’s coming from. she may be going through a hard time in her personal life and this has nothing to do with you, or maybe there is something that you could work on and with communication you guys could work through it. if there’s nothing or she doesn’t say anything then don’t blame yourself. when you’re feeling down and want to cry, reach out to another family member or a friend to calm you down and remind you that you’re not a burden. but i really would just try talking to her and open up to her about how her words make you feel. i hope things get better for you.
Sound devices are resources used bypoets to convey and reinforce the meaning or experience of poetrythrough the skillful use of sound. After all, poets are trying to use a concentrated blend of sound and imagery to create an emotional response.
Answer:
C? It might be wrong but i think it might be because aesthetic impact is using intuition and emotion to relate to something, and since 'loss' is emotional, the filmaker has an aesthetic impact.
Explanation:
The argument is that the original US Constitution did not intend for African slaves to be “citizens” of the United States. It is historically false since as dissenter justices Curtis and McLean stated, five of the original 13 states had a sizable minority of free black men who were citizens that could also vote in federal and state elections. Now that being established, the correct answer should be “hasty generalization” since the argument pretends that all citizens, at the time of the ratification of the constitution were white and that only these "all white" citizens were able to vote which is historically false. It could not be a genetic fallacy since the historical precedent invalidates the claim that the intended meaning of the word “citizens” only applied to white Americans. It could not be an <em>ad populum</em> fallacy since not all Americans agreed with such contention, and finally, it could not be a case of begging the claim since they do provide a finding that in their view supports their erroneous conclusion, so it is not circular logic.
