<span>in order to have many groups come together and work towards legislation and controlling government decision, a consensus must be formed
in consensus, the included groups should get together and find a way to work out a "middle ground" that will bring positive results for all the groups that were involved</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I do not agree with what John Green said.
John Green stated that it might have been better if the Persians beat the Greeks. His arguments were that the Persian life was not bad. Persians ruled prosperous cities. And he comments that life was not easy in ancient Greece if you were a woman or a slave.
Of course, Greece was not perfect and had many issues. But the Persia Empire also had its many issues too.
I think it was good that Greece won the Persian Wars. The Greek victory established a foundation of a classical time in which Greece "exported" the idea of democracy to other states, as well as the philosophical ideas of great thinkers of Athens. Arts, literature, sculpture, and architecture were other important Greek influences that transcended the test of time.
A new government grounded on democracy and classical liberalism(Enlightenment ideals)
Radical Republicans and Carpetbaggers
Explanation:
Catholic ideas of the time backed up social and political inequality: for example, Church teachings described monarchs and noble people as closer to God than ordinary people. ... This kind of thinking meant that Luther was on his way to heresy—that is, beliefs that went against the principles of the Catholic faith
