Answer:British authorities were concerned that going to war against a Muslim country could fuel anti-imperialist protests among India’s large Muslim population
Explanation:
Answer: Miranda vs. Arizona - 5th amendment
Brown vs. Board of Education - Segregation was unconstitutional.
Marbury vs. Madison - U.S. Government must function...
Plessy vs. Ferguson - Segregation is constitutional.
Explanation: Here are some videos further explaining the cases!
Miranda vs. Arizona - https://youtu.be/FJ7ooBJ_DEU
Brown vs. Board of Education - https://youtu.be/4F4edxloXCc
Marbury vs. Madison - https://youtu.be/GLTCf1NMAj4
Plessy vs. Ferguson - https://youtu.be/vsDTqtyiNZk
Answer:
A-The leader of the Ottawa nation attacked the British.
Explanation:
The Ottawa nation leader was called "Pontiac" this gives the war its name "The Pontiacs War", a confederacy of native americans were dissatisfied with the British policies in the Great Lakes, this made Pontiac lead its army of native americans to the fort of Detroit in order to take the supplies and weaponery that the British had there and then attack other forts that were located on former French land, as they couldn´t actually take any fort they began a siege with several forts that was finally defeated in 1766 when the British sent extra troops and re-inforcements and the French didn´t want to ally with the indians to recover their lands.
Answer:
It was limited by weather, landforms, and seasons.
Explanation:
Prehistoric clans or people who were believed to have lived between 2 million years ago and 1,200 BC are known or referred to as Hunter-Gatherers. This is because they only hunt for food which is mostly wild animals and gathers fruits found around naturally.
During this period, contact with other clans among themselves was determined by a lot of factors most especially due to the lack of any form of advancement. The contacts among these clans were limited by weather, landforms, and seasons.
