Answer:
No, death of Mercutio does not seem to be justified.
Death of Mercutio can not be justified because his death was accidental.
Neither Tybalt's death seem to be justified.
Explanation:
Romeo and Juliet is a Romantic Tragedy written by William Shakespeare.
In Act 3, Scene 1, of the play, in a feud between Tybalt and Mercutio, Mercutio was killed accidentally by Tybalt. Tybalt and Mercutio entered the sword fight after Tybalt continues to instigate Romeo for fight and Mercutio, being hot-tempered, challenged Tybalt for the feud. To stop the fight, Romeo enters the feud and in this, Tybalt's sword escapes Romeo's arm and stabs Mercutio to death.
So, this shows that Mercutio does not seem to die and his death can not be justified as his death was an accident.
Death of Tybalt also does not seem to be justified as he was killed in anger by Romeo to avenge the death of his friend, Mercutio. After killing Tybalt, Romeo also seem to realize that he should not have killed Tybalt.
I cannot wait TILL SCHOOL IS OVER
in spires of the snakes repulsive nature, why do you think God created it?
Student is to school
Person is to family
Answer: C) Poison dart frogs are brightly colored and poisonous to animals that eat them.
A is not the answer because that line explains where frogs get their names from, and introduces the topic of bright colors talking about the frog's bright eyes. B links the topic of bright colors to the fact that they serve as a warning sign for poison or danger, and D supports this topic by stating that bright colors help red-eyed tree frogs survive in nature. C, on the other hand, introduces a new species of frog that is not talked about during the rest of the essay, and it does not support the idea of colors being crucial in the red-eyed tree frog's surivival.
