The above question wants to assess your personal perception of Sunni Ali and his effectiveness as a leader. For that reason, I cannot answer this question for you, but I will show you how to answer it.
First, you must research who Sunni Ali was and how he led his people. You must assess whether this kind of leadership is beneficial or harmful, noting whether Sunni Ali has managed to lead his people to prosperity or not.
Based on this survey, you should write your answer as follows:
- Introduce who Sunni Ali was.
- Show how he led his people.
- Show if you see him as a good or a bad leader.
- Present the achievements or defeats that his leadership resulted.
It is important to note that Sunni Ali was the leader of the Songhai Empire. He focused his leadership on building a well-structured and strong army capable of fighting enemies, promoting territorial expansion, and winning wealth for the empire.
More information:
brainly.com/question/23490207?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Scout learns he is a really good lawyer, good at checkers, he can play a Jew's harp, and that he used to be a really good shooter.
Hope this helps:)
by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"