Answer: Prohibition is a law or restriction that has been put in place to counteract something from happening. This is primarily legal in nature, and put into place by legislative power.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option C - Resources. Please let me know if it's correct or not
Answer: The answer is provided below
Explanation:
The four liabilities of incoming and outgoing partners are:
1. person who is admitted as a partner to an existing firm apart from a limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership doesn't by that particular admission alone become liable for anything which is done before the person becomes a partner.
2. A person admitted as a general partner into a limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership that already exists does not by the admission alone become liable for things done before the individual became a general partner.
3. A partner who retires from a firm other than limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership doesn't by the retirement alone cease to be liable for the partnership debts and the obligations that were incurred before the retirement of the partner.
4. A partner who retires from a limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership
doesn't by the retirement alone cease to be liable for the liabilities of the firm that were incurred before the retirement of the partner for which the partner were liable.
Answer:
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Explanation:
