Liability that can occur when a person’s careless and inattentive actions cause harm is called criminal negligence.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Criminal negligence is carelessness which needs a greater degree of guilt than the civil negligence norm. The civil definition of negligence is characterized as failing to obey a reasonable person's standard of behavior in the same circumstance as the offender. To demonstrate this negligence, the plaintiff needs to prove the state of mind engaged in it beyond possible doubt.
If a person is guilty of some crime, he or she must behave with a male rea or a criminal intent. However, under very limited cases, criminal negligence may override criminal intent. When it does, even though the acts are accidental, it may expose somebody to serious offenses like child danger or homicide.
The foreign policy of the United States is its interactions with foreign nations and how it sets standards of interaction for its organizations, corporations and system citizens of the United States. So I would say the answer is National Security.
There is no crime of homicide. Walt had no motive for killing the jogger and this was clearly an accident. Not even reckless driving. Walt stops to help. That's all we know. Did he then leave the scene? That would be a crime. Based on what we're told, there is no homicide. No intent to kill the jogger.
