Answer: at the time? They thought he was using the dedication of the cemetery for the fallen soldiers as a political opportunity
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
UK: The UK wanted the British Empire to reign supreme and free access to seas in peacetime, however knew that making the treaty too harsh would provoke another war (foreshadowing)
France: France wanted Germany to be partitioned into separate states, which was basically pre-brothers war Germany. They wanted the Germans to be banned from ever uniting again.
US: The US wanted its 14 points to become the image of the League of Nations. However not all of these 14 points were met and the US soon returned to its isolationist pre-war policy.
As similarities, we can say that the two societies created systems that influenced the advancement of science and research.
As differences, the Babylonians created technologies more empiric and that did not represent something physical, while the Sumerians created technologies that were palpable and focused on work.
<h3>What were the creations?</h3>
- The Sumerians created the wheel, irrigation systems, sandals, and some tools such as the saw and harpoons, in addition to creating alcoholic beverages, cuneiform writing, geometry, and arithmetic.
- The Babylonians created the numerical system, the system of laws, trigonometry, and the foundations of astronomy.
Both societies were significant and created various elements that promoted social advancement, science, technology, and general knowledge. In addition, these societies promoted commercial elements, communication, optimized work, and the promotion of social well-being, through their technologies and discoveries that are used today and that promoted human survival.
Learn more about Babylon:
brainly.com/question/7850980
#SPJ1
Antietam, also called the Battle of Sharpsburg
Explanation:
mercantilism, economic theory and practice common in Europe from the 16th to the 18th century that promoted governmental regulation of a nation's economy for the purpose of augmenting state power at the expense of rival national powers. It was the economic counterpart of political absolutism.
