Answer:
The author believes that the best approach towards free speech in the private sector is for the private entities to censor speech by their users.
Explanation:
According to the author, private entities were responsible for the censoring of free speech not the state.
He went on to say that these private sectors have the rights to offer these regulations on their different platforms and make exclusions to certain speech of their members.
Evidence can be see  in the third paragraph. The author implied here that private sector has a right to invoke the first amendment clause that limits speeches that are lawless, full of threat and obscenity.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
I believe the answer is B. 
Explanation:
Key word: Descriptive (Like description) Descriptions are specific.
 
        
             
        
        
        
In many cases, you can't nail down the spelling of a word without knowing 
what it means.
You didn't tell us what your word means, so there are different possibilities.  
Here are a few:
-- In old German, a wagon driver was a wagner (VOG-nair) or <u>weiner</u> (VEIN-air). 
As the Yiddish language (spoken among German Jews) developed from old high 
German, some of them used the same word 'weiner' to mean 'one who makes or 
sells wine'.  The word came to the New World as a family name, spelled "Viner",
(as in my first high school crush).
-- The ancient city of Vienna, now the capital of modern Austria, is called "Wien" 
(VEEN) in the languages around there.  A person who was born or raised there 
is called a <u>Wiener</u> (VEEN-air).  Also, a small sausage that became popular there 
was also called a Wiener. That's where we got the slang term 'weener' for a hot 
dog or anything that resembles one. 
-- A little kid who whimpers and whines all the time is called a <u>whiner.</u>
So the spelling really often depends on what your word means.  That's one 
reason why, in a spelling bee, they always give you a sentence along with 
the word.
        
             
        
        
        
The Cunninghams are a poor farming family in Maycomb. They are hard-working, but are not aware of many social cues, as they spend most of their time working on the farm. Walter Cunningham Sr. is a good man overall, but gets swept into the racism and hive-mindedness of the town. 
The Ewells are also a poor family in the area, but do not have a good reputation in Maycomb. They live in a run-down part of town, their children only go to school the first day of the school year each year to sneak their way around the law, and their father is known around town for being a low-life. This proves to be true in the courtroom scene, when we find that Bob Ewell is also an abusive liar. 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
established facts.
case studies.
statistics.
experiments.
analogies and logical reasoning.
citation of recognized experts on the issue.
Hope this helps!
Explanation: