1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DaniilM [7]
3 years ago
14

How is having the power of veto an example of checks and balances? *

History
1 answer:
Darina [25.2K]3 years ago
6 0

Hope this helps

The veto allows the President to “check” the legislature by reviewing acts passed by Congress and blocking measures he finds unconstitutional, unjust, or unwise. Congress's power to override the President's veto forms a “balance” between the branches on the lawmaking power.

You might be interested in
Another way to say that something is scarce is to say that it is (3 points) plentiful rare useful great
rjkz [21]


Something scarce is something that is not found easily. It is sometimes limited therefore it is RARE.

Your answer would be rare. :) Hope I helped. :D

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I got bit by a guy covered in purple paint <br>so does that make it the bite of 87?​
Effectus [21]
It definitely does.
6 0
2 years ago
Fill in the blacks to explain why Emma Edmonds stopped posing as Frank Thompson
OLEGan [10]
In the spring of 1863, Edmonds and the 2nd Michigan were assigned to the Army of the Cumberland and sent to Kentucky. Edmonds contracted malaria and requested a furlough, which was denied. Not wanting to seek medical attention from the army for fear of discovery, Edmonds left her comrades in mid-April, never to return. “Franklin Thompson” was subsequently charged with desertion.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the impeachment process, the _____ brings charges against the president and the ____ acts as a court.
ankoles [38]

n the impeachment process, the House of Representatives brings charges against the president and the Senate acts as a court.

The House of Representatives is mandated with the power to impeach officials including the president. The senate on the other hand has the sole power to carry out the trial


4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help me explain please!!!!
hammer [34]
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, a little-discussed provision originally aimed at former Confederates. As relevant here, Section 3 says "no person" may "hold any office, civil or military, under the United States," who, "having previously taken an oath as…an officer of the United States…to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."

Before we process, it important to state and describe what the First Amendment say.

The First Amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
The freedoms in the First Amendment include the freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.

Citing the article of impeachment against the President Trump;

Inciting his followers to violently obstruct the congressional affirmation of President-elect Joe Biden's victory last Wednesday. President Trump's "prior efforts to subvert and obstruct the certification of the results of the 2020 Presidential election,"

Those actions, the article says, "threatened the integrity of the democratic system, interfered with the peaceful transition of power, and imperiled a coequal branch of Government." Trump "thereby betrayed his trust as President, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States."

Most of President Trump supporters who were arrested among those that stormed the United States Congress stated that they were urged by what President Trump said calling on his supporters who showed up in D.C. to protest Congress’s certification of the Electoral College and Biden’s victory. When addressing the demonstration during a speech, he encouraged people present to march toward the Capitol, during his rally on January 6th to storm the US Congress therefore President Trump is liable to the cause of the insurrection. Many of the rioters were found to have posted unfounded claims promoted by Trump that the election had been stolen or that widespread voter fraud contributed to President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.

First, federal law makes it a crime to engage “in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof.” Someone who violates this statute faces a fine and up to 10 years in prison.

This law makes it a crime to incite such a rebellion, too, and violators “shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.” Thus, to the extent that a government official was complicit in Wednesday’s riot, they could potentially be stripped of their office.

Second, the law prohibits a “seditious conspiracy” to “overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States” or to “by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States.” Participants in such a conspiracy could face up to 20 years in prison.

Third, federal law provides that “whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States ... by force or violence” may face up to 20 years in prison, and may also be stripped of their ability to be employed by the federal government for up to five years.
Because this statute criminalizes speech, anyone charged under it would likely claim that prosecuting them violates the First Amendment. But the Supreme Court recognizes several exceptions to the First Amendment for things like incitement to imminent criminal acts or so-called “true threats.” So some of the insurrectionists might be convicted under this statute despite constitutional safeguards for free speech.

Finally, another statute makes it a crime to conspire “to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person ... in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” Thus, to the extent that members of Congress were exercising a “privilege” secured to them by the Constitution while they were disrupted by rioters, those rioters could potentially face criminal charges.
Violators of this statute face up to 10 years in prison.


7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is 13 down for this?
    10·1 answer
  • Rome was a matriarchal society.<br> a.true<br> b.false
    8·1 answer
  • 12. Muslims supported Economic growth causing it to spread by *
    6·1 answer
  • This is government agency decid d to overthrow Castro
    12·2 answers
  • HELP ME! *13 POINTS*
    12·1 answer
  • Animals captured and tamed for human use are called ____ animals.
    8·1 answer
  • Is there a country in it golden age
    9·1 answer
  • The importance of the summit meetings of 1959-61 for relations between East<br> and West.
    5·1 answer
  • 20. ______ we______ some cake at the moment? * 1 คะแนน
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement accurately describes the term Manifest Destiny?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!