Answer:
Then some of the ladies began to say that it was a disgrace to the town and a bad example
He would never divulge what happened during that interview, but he refused to go back again.
Explanation:
We can infer from Evidence 1 that they are talking about Emily as later on in the text, it mentions Emily. Therefore, this is an indirect statement saying that Emily is a disgrace to the town due to her tough behaviour.
Evidence 2 shows that the Baptist saw something bad as he refuses to go back due to the horror he's seen. Therefore, both statements are inferral based but we can kind of guess from the rest of the text.
Sorry, I'm not sure this makes much sense. It did in my head at least.
Answer:
2.reaveals the opinions of the reader
It emphasizes the savagery of the assassins’ actions toward Caesar. This is how Shakespeare’s use of the word slaughter rather than murder affect the meaning of the passage.
The word slaughter shows much more "rude" effect than the word murder. So, Shakespeare used this slaughter word so that readers can feel the brutality with which Caesar was killed.
Not only because he was stabbed several times, but also because one of the people who killed him was Brutus and also his death was agreed by a plot, not by something that Caesar has done.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C -It emphasizes the savagery of the assassins' actions toward Caesar.
Learn more about Julius Caesar on brainly.com/question/3718085
#SPJ4
Answer: With, learned, around, Later, Bought
Explanation: i hope this helps! :D
B.Explains why the paper is written.
Hope this helps(this statement is overused)
