It did because the people were upset with the second back of the United Staes.
What is the point of quitting gets u know where then farther back than u already were might as well keep going man
Answer:
Grow, Lower, A decrease.
Explanation:
I just finished these are correct.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
Hi Frankie! You have to actually tell us your question, this doesn't give us much information about what you need! and I also I believe this is under math, not history!
