In many ways, Pyrrhus is a foil to Hamlet. For example, Pyrrhus is impulsive and rash, while Hamlet is contemplative and indecisive.
What is Pyrrhus?
Pyrrhus was a Hellenistic-era Greek king and statesman. He was the Aeacid royal house's king of the Greek Molossians tribe before succeeding to the throne of Epirus. He was regarded as being one of the greatest generals in ancient times and was one of early Rome's strongest adversaries. He suffered intolerably high losses in a number of his victories, giving rise to the phrase "Pyrrhic victory." 13-year-old Pyrrhus had become king of Epirus in 306 BC, but Cassander overthrew him four years later. He participated in the Diadochi Wars before being helped by Ptolemy I Soter to retake his throne in 297 BC. In the course of what became known as the Pyrrhic War,
Additionally, Pyrrhus is vengeful and driven by a desire for revenge, while Hamlet is more concerned with justice. Finally, Pyrrhus is single-minded in his pursuit of his goals, while Hamlet is easily distracted.
To learn more about Pyrrhus
brainly.com/question/5617546
#SPJ4
Answer:
In October of 1950, UN forces pushed the North Koreans as far north as the Yalu River on the border with China.
Explanation:
The colonists could get property and move up the social scale.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
Source b is imperialistic while source d is not
Explanation:
Guessing from similar questions that have had this same output in the past. Please include a screenshot when asking questions like this. Sounds like a MS question so this should be in the ballpark
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The two tactics used by nations outside of South Africa to encourage the end of apartheid can be summarized below:
1. The use of economic and cultural sanctions on South Africa by European countries
2. The United States passage the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act in 1986.
All these tactics affected South Africa in terms of political, economic, and military representations.
