Answer:
B. Citizens cannot be forced to house soldiers
Explanation:
The Petition of Right was a request sent to King Charles I by the English Parliament in 1628. This petition argued that there had been some excesses of the government, and asked for a limitation of it. The petition defended four main principles:
<em>1. No taxation without the consent of Parliament.</em>
<em>2. No imprisonment without just cause.</em>
<em>3. No quartering of soldiers on subjects.</em>
<em>4. No martial law during peacetime.</em>
Wait what do I mean by that
Because the Europeans had already been exposed to the diseases and had built an immunity to it, and the Native Americans hadn't, hope this helps
That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
"The few. The Proud. The Marines."
