The feature of static visual is that they are used to grab your audience's attention.
Static visuals, similar to photos, are more compelling at staying in the watcher's mind, since they are not continually evolving. Visuals ought to have restricted content, except if showing insights, as an excessive number of words debilitate the effect of your message.
Static visuals ought to be utilized while exhibiting measurements. At the point when information is displayed in a video, data is excessively brief for the mind, making it impossible to process. Like promotions, static visuals go about as data sheets that show prove or convey a philosophy. Not at all like static visuals, moving visuals are eye catching. Short clasps and activitys have the ability to be more provocative than static visuals.
Your answer is B
But Graceland was groundbreaking for wearing its influence for all to see. South African musicians and singers were invited to share the spotlight with Simon, giving many of them mainstream international exposure for the first time. Still, some elements of the project remain problematic.
Sure hope this helps you and pls mark me as brainiest
What's ur problem? That's just a title