Determine whether the stated conclusion is valid based on the given information. If not, write invalid. Explain your reasoning.
3. Given: If a number is divisible by 4, then the number is divisible by 2. 12 is divisible by four.
Conclusion: 12 is divisible by 2.
SOLUTION:
If p → q is a true statement and p is true, then q. Here, a number divisible 4 is divisible by 2 also and 12 is divisible by 4. So, 12 is divisible by 2 is a valid statement by the Law of Detachment.
ANSWER:
valid; Law of Detachment
4. Given: If Elan stays up late, he will be tired the next day. Elan is tired.
Conclusion: Elan stayed up late.
SOLUTION:
If p is true, then q is true, but q being true does not necessarily mean that p is true. Elan could be tired because he worked out. So, the statement is invalid.
ANSWER:
Invalid; Elan could be tired because he worked out.
eSolutions Manual - Powered by Cognero
For this case, the parent function is given by:

We apply the following transformations:
Vertical translations:
Suppose that k> 0
To graph y = f (x) + k, move the graph of k units upwards:
For k = 9 we have:

Horizontal translations:
Suppose that h> 0
To graph y = f (x-h), move the graph of h units to the right
For h = 4 we have:

Answer:
The function g (x) is given by:

Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Population mean, μ = 108
Sample mean,
= 107
Sample size, n = 110
Alpha, α = 0.02
Population standard deviation, σ = 7
Formula:
Putting all the values, we have

The test statistic is -1.50
<u>Answer:</u>
Rhonda will not fall 264 times in 360 jumps.
<u>Solution:</u>
Given, The ratio of jumps to falls for ice skater Rhonda is 4 falls to every 15 jumps.
We have to find At this rate, how many times will she not fall in 360 jumps.
Now,
For 15 jumps → 4 falls
For 360 jumps → n falls
Now apply Chris cross method,

So, she falls 96 times in 360 jumps.
Then, number of times she will not fall = 360 jumps – 96 falls = 264 times.
Hence, Rhonda will not fall 264 times in 360 jumps.