here is the correct order :
First-person point of view - A) It places the reader into the action as a character in the story.
Second-person point of view -B) It engages the reader with a character from a story narrating the action.
Third-person point of view -C) It allows you to reveal the inner thoughts of multiple characters.
Answer:
Despite the ominous weather and extremely dangerous conditions, the author faces the glacier and is moved by its beauty. He uses his past experience to bolster his confidence.
Explanation:
i red the story so what is your question?
In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:
"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."
Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.
On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.
In order to summon the dead, he must kill a ram and fill a pit with his blood, and that will attract ghosts who will want to drink it. Then, he must defend it from other ghosts who want it until Terias comes to drink it.
