Answer: The scenario exemplifies <em><u>simplification.</u></em>
Explanation:
Simplification is a process used to make something easier to understand. It can also be used to help something more simple to learn and also to easier to do.
With this scenario, the manager is interacting the exact same way as they always do no matter where they are located. This is helpful because the manager does not need to learn or remember to change the way they act when meeting someone new in business.
Answer:
D. An unaccepted offer.
Explanation:
The contract is an unaccepted offer because it was supposed to be signed either by, or on behalf of, Evelyn, but Evelyn neither signed the contract nor authorized Donald to sign for her, and she did not even ratified it in first place.
The contract is void.
Answer:
D)fraud
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about Olive, the owner of Olive’s Orchard, contracts to sell its harvest to Pure Foods, Inc. Later Olive refuses to perform. Pure Foods files a suit to enforce the contract. Olive and Pure Foods are in a state that does not recognize the doctrine of unconscionability. To defend successfully against enforcement of the contract on similar grounds,. In this case, Olive might rely on traditional notions of a fraud. Fraud can be regarded as an act of deception which is intentional to deprive those that fall for it their legal right. It is activities that gives the perpetrator an unlawful gain or to deny a victim their right. It is carried out by people to get financial or personal gain in an unlawful manner. Some types of fraud that are common are are tax fraud, bankruptcy fraud. as well as credit card fraud,
Answer:
The Given Statement is True
Explanation:
It is true that globalization causes the businesses, countries and people to become increasingly interdependent. Globalization means operating internationally which causes the people, businesses and the countries to depend on each other. Globalization is also used to describe the increasing interdependence of countries, people and businesses.
Answer: Yes, in light of the fact that the dumping practices pose a serious (and credible) threat, she does have a prima facie obligation to blow the whistle
Explanation:
Helen has the right to blow the whistle because engineers in well protected society for whistle blowing can have legal and moral support if they disclose some irregularity and corruption in their industry. In denial of not making known the decadence in the industry exposes individuals who work there and the society at large to a risk. Safety is a primary factor in any industry and whatever isn't done well or in the right manner is a danger to everyone
