I think the most safest way is to use a sponge or a cloth
The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.
A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.
No one Congress The state militias The continental army
Answer:
b. establishing their own railroad line; owning their own bank
Explanation:
The Grange focused their efforts on establishing their own railroad line, while the Farmers’ Alliance was more focused on owning their own bank.
The Farmers' Alliance grew out of the Grange movement.Farmers Alliance believed that interest rates were too high because of monopolistic lenders, and the money supply was inadequate, producing deflation which makes them to focus their struggle on owning their own banks in order to tackle the issues of interest rate etc
