Deforestation is caused which means that they are being cleared faster than they can grow back. this problem can be fixed if less growth would happen around forests, this problem could be fixed if there were to be more trees planted.
By the final constitution i'm assuming you mean the tenth amendment which is assigning all power not delegated to the United States, or prohibited to the states, to either the states or to the people.
I wouldn't have changed this because in england at that time all the power was to the king and the people didn't get to say on certain matters. Though if I had to make it I'd make it so women could vote, because back then the men get to do have all the power and it's not equal, so I would obviously include women and minorities into the people with power.
✿
The most important role in the government for me is the president because if we have a horrible president (Donald Trump) then there's a lot of thing's that will go wrong inside the U.S, ranging from same sex marriage potentially being taken away, women's rights being in danger, ect. Having someone like that in the highest form of power over millions of people is uh- gross? You need someone who would actually care about the people and would do what's right, that's why this is the most important role.
✿
The least important role in the government for me is the people in charge that abuse their power. Yes, this might not be a role inside the government but the fact that they keep people like this in power while knowing the abusive things they do, is disgusting.
✿
Ack I hope this is what you're talking about, sorry it's lengthy. ^^;
I like you're bakugo pfp thoo
Strict scrutiny, moderate scrutiny, and logical basis scrutiny are three tests.
To evaluate the legitimacy of differential treatment based on a suspicious classification, a Strict scrutiny test is applied (race, ethnic origin, religion).
In free exercise clause cases, the court previously applied strict scrutiny more frequently, as in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), but the Employment Division v. Smith decision altered the approach (1990).
When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. The law must have been carefully crafted to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest" and have been passed by the legislature in order to pass rigorous scrutiny.
A law impacting a fundamental right must have a compelling state purpose in order to pass under the Strict Scrutiny criterion. In order to accomplish the goal or interest of the government, the law must also be carefully crafted.
To know more about Strict Scrutiny refer to: brainly.com/question/11550284
#SPJ1
The answer is A. The economic crisis of 2008.
