I hope this helps. George Washinton had to develop how to start with a knew country and not have the same difficulties that King Gorge the third had. They wanted to make sure that nobody had to much power. They also had to come up with the constitution and the Bill of Rights. John Adams in the other hand was the first Federalist ever elected for president. Thomas Jefferson sponsored the Lewis and Clark exposition to explore the Western territory. James Madison had a big problem when there was a war against Britain in 1813, trying to stop the trade. I hope this helped you.
Early mercantilism meant primarily aiming to reduce imports. This issue is related mainly to articles of luxury. The mercantilists believed fact that the foundation of the wealth of the state is a positive trade balance - the dominance of exports over imports. Source of such beliefs lay still in the medieval practice of governance - the monarchs gather financial reserves necessary for an effective policy. <span>However, in the developed theory of mercantilism, welfare of the residents and the strength of the state directly combined with the development of the industry. It is associated with it hopes for economic self-sufficiency of the country. In addition, the mercantilists preached direct relationship between economic power of the country's human potential.</span>
Answer: Periodization is the process of categorizing quantities. In history, periodization orginizes the study of analaysis through orginization within history.
Explanation:
Bassicly it shows understanding between historist prosiseses and a way to link them all up.
They enforce the laws of the land, and keep everything and everyone in line.
How you answer that question depends much on your political point of view. A 2006 article by Ron Haskins, published by the conservative Brookings Institute, declared the 1996 welfare reforms a success. Haskins pointed to evidence such as a 60% decline in the welfare caseload by 2004 as a result of the 1996 reforms. He also pointed to studies indicating that 60 to 80% of adults leaving welfare are gainfully employed.
Meanwhile, liberal writers such as Peter Edelman and Barbara Ehrenreich, writing in the <em>Washington Post </em>(<span>December 6, 2009), have said that welfare reform failed, because the number of those living in poverty in America rose in the years following welfare reform. The lack of access to welfare contributed to that rise in poverty, they argue. It's harder for people to get cash assistance through Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (which is what welfare was renamed). But dependence on food stamps doubled in the years after Clinton left office.
So "success" or "disaster" will depend on whether viewed through a conservative or liberal lens.</span>
