Answer:
The corrects answers for this would be A and C.
Explanation:
As you can see, for both a and c, those are the only two answers that have a negative outcome, hence the negative externality.
Answer:
$1,000,000
Explanation:
Gallagher Corporation
Stock option × Option estimated fair value /Numbers of years
Stock option $400,000
Option estimated fair value $10
Numbers of years 4
Hence:
($400,000 × $10) / 4 years
=$4,000,000/4years
= $1,000,000
Therefore pretax compensation expense for year 1 will be $1,000,000
Answer:
Walker's did not outperform because it PE Ratio is close to Industry average. Industry's data is based on average which means some of the firms may have very high PE ratio and some might have quite lower than the average. It is not obvious that the Walker's outperformed or under-performed. Complete data about the individual firms might make us able to compare the performance of Walker's. Apparently its performance is up to the mark as its PE ratio is very close to Industry average.
Explanation:
<u>PE Ratio</u> is a term which show the investors confidence on the firm. It shows that how much price investors are willing to pay against each unit of earning.
Answer:
The second gamble has the higher expected value. EV = 4
Explanation:
In betting, expected value can be defined as (Amount won per bet * probability of winning) – (Amount lost per bet * probability of losing)
For the first gamble:
For the second gamble:
This means that Cal is expected to earn $4 for each $20 waged on the second gamble while he is expected to break even in the first gamble.
Therefore, the second gamble has the higher expected value.
The answer is true hope i helped
