The strategy for non-profit organizations for long term thinking I believe would be related to how they can foster social entrepeneurship to enhance their ability to serve the public in terms of research (such as of mining companies practices in foreign countries like with Mining Watch say) and in terms of how they spend their money to improve the social conditions for those they serve like say people with mental and developmental disabilities.
Answer:
more intense the competitive pressures posed by substitute products.
Explanation:
The lower the user's switching costs: the more intense the competitive pressures posed by substitute products.
Switching costs can be defined as the cost of a consumer switching from a product to a substitute good.
Therefore when such switching costs are low, it will be easier to switch from one product to another, implying that the competitive pressure from substitute goods are higher.
Answer:
1. What is the Commerce Clause?
The Commerce Clause refers to the power held by Congress to regulate interstate commerce. Individual states can regulate commerce that takes place within their territory, but they cannot regulate trade between entities from their state and entities from other states.
2. Will the Arizona regulation withstand Commerce Clause scrutiny? Why or why not?
This is an actual court case and the US Supreme Court ruled against Arizona's regulation because it interferes with interstate commerce. The cantaloupes that Bruce Church produced were supposed to be sold in California, that means that 2 states are involved. The Commerce Clause applies whenever trade between 2 states are involved. An individual state's regulations cannot result in a burden for businesses engaged in interstate commerce.
Answer:
Explanation:
Here Nicolas will gain comparative advantage only when he is selling the good he is specializing in and he would specialize in that good which would have lower opportunity cost for him. So the first step that we have to do here is to find out for which good Nicolas will have lower opportunity cost.
For Nicolas who in 8 hours can either catch 24 pound of fish or repair 15 cars,
the opportunity cost for catching 1 fish is = 15/24 = .625
the opportunity cost for repairing 1 car is = 24/15 = 1.6
So from the above observation we can say that for Nicolas catching fish has lower opportunity cost for him , so he should specialize in catching fish.
Therefore the term of trade for Nicolas would be
1 fish = .625 cars ,
if he can catch and sell 100 units worth of fish then he would have to give up 62.5 cars and then only he will gain from trade,
1 x 100 fish = .625 x 100
100 fish = 62.5 cars.
