The decline or collapse of classical empires in eastern and western Eurasia best accounts for the change in the overall number of major cities between 200 and 400 C.E.
Option C
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The Roman Empire was the highest political and social system in Western civilization at its height (c. 117 CE). By 285 CE the empire was larger than the Central Government in Rome, so the empire was divided into the western and eastern empires by Emperor Diocletian, R. 284-305 CE.
Yet, by raising Maximum (r. 286-305) to co-emperor, the kingdom was always as huge as it split it in half in about 285 CE in order to facilitate better management. In this way, he established the Western Empire and the Eastern Roman Empire.
Considering that a lack of detail was a major cause of the empire crisis, Diocletian announced that succeeds should be selected and accepted from the start of a person's reign.
The Generals Maxentius and Constantine are two of certain successors In 305 CE, Diocletian formally retired from control, and the tetrarchy fractured in rival empire regions to govern. Maxentius and Constantine forced the Empire back into civil war after the demise of Diocletian in the year 311 CE.
During the era of exploitation, Europe was trying to recover from a crisis situation. Despite the fears and superstitions surrounding sea travel, the Europeans began a process of expansion, seeking solutions offshore to overcome the crisis. They wanted to solve problems like:
- The lack of gold to coin money, necessary to boost trade;
- The lack of raw materials and labor for agricultural production and manufacturing.
The gold that supplied the European markets came from the interior of Africa, through Morocco. Oriental products arrived at the Ports of Europe through the Muslim merchants. The aim of the Europeans, and the Portuguese in particular, was to get to the origin of these products and control their marketing.
He offered amnesty to draft evaders
hope this helps
<span />