The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), signed on October 30, 1947, by 23 countries, was a legal agreement minimizing barriers to international trade by eliminating or reducing quotas, tariffs, and subsidies while preserving significant regulations.
<h3><u>What Exactly Is the GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade)?</u></h3>
The GATT became active on January 1st, 1948. It has since been improved, finally leading to the World Trade Organization (WTO) being established on January 1, 1995, which absorbed and enlarged it. Its agreements, which at this point encompassed nearly 90% of world trade, had 125 signatories.
The GATT is overseen by the Council for Trade in Goods (Goods Council), which is made up of members from every WTO member state. Swedish Ambassador Mikael Anzén will serve as the Goods Council's head as of September 2020. There are ten committees on the council that deals with issues like anti-dumping laws, market access, and agriculture.
Learn more about the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/1446090
#SPJ4
In between hindu and muslims the politicians are taking advantage. Some are supporting hindus for gaining votes whereas some are supporting muslims.
"<span>c. Conversion to Christianity was not a means to escape bondage" would be the best option, since although many slaves were encouraged to "find God" this did not mean that they were given special treatment. </span>
Answer:
The "CIVILIZING MISSION" argument
Explanation:
Colonialism is a practice of domination, which involves the subjugation of one people to another. One of the difficulties in defining colonialism is that it is hard to distinguish it from imperialism. Frequently the two concepts are treated as synonyms. Like colonialism, imperialism also involves political and economic control over a dependent territory. The etymology of the two terms, however, provides some clues about how they differ. The term colony comes from the Latin word colonus, meaning farmer. This root reminds us that the practice of colonialism usually involved the transfer of population to a new territory, where the arrivals lived as permanent settlers while maintaining political allegiance to their country of origin. Imperialism, on the other hand, comes from the Latin term imperium, meaning to command. Thus, the term imperialism draws attention to the way that one country exercises power over another, whether through settlement, sovereignty, or indirect mechanisms of control.
The legitimacy of colonialism has been a longstanding concern for political and moral philosophers in the Western tradition. At least since the Crusades and the conquest of the Americas, political theorists have struggled with the difficulty of reconciling ideas about justice and natural law with the practice of European sovereignty over non-Western peoples. In the nineteenth century, the tension between liberal thought and colonial practice became particularly acute, as dominion of Europe over the rest of the world reached its zenith. Ironically, in the same period when most political philosophers began to defend the principles of universalism and equality, the same individuals still defended the legitimacy of colonialism and imperialism. One way of reconciling those apparently opposed principles was the argument known as the “civilizing mission,” which suggested that a temporary period of political dependence or tutelage was necessary in order for “uncivilized” societies to advance to the point where they were capable of sustaining liberal institutions and self-government.
