I think it’s C. I have no idea tho. It just makes the most sense!
Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.
The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. Although the United States embarked on a famine relief program in the Soviet Union in the early 1920s and American businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the New Economic Policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. By that time, the totalitarian nature of Joseph Stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the West. Although World War II brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward Eastern Europe had created tensions even before the war ended.
The Soviet Union and the United States stayed far apart during the next three decades of superpower conflict and the nuclear and missile arms race. Beginning in the early 1970s, the Soviet regime proclaimed a policy of détente and sought increased economic cooperation and disarmament negotiations with the West. However, the Soviet stance on human rights and its invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 created new tensions between the two countries. These tensions continued to exist until the dramatic democratic changes of 1989–91 led to the collapse during this past year of the Communist system and opened the way for an unprecedented new friendship between the United States and Russia, as well as the other new nations of the former Soviet Union.
Answer:
National Security Council
Explanation:
Explanation:
1 - Puppetry, being used by his former jailers and racists to push white interests and selling out his own people.
2 - Lack of vision. He was not a reformer. He failed to reform South Africa, the country’s cultural values, education system and so on.
3 - He failed to address the crime situation and endemic violence in the society.
4 - He failed to improve and expand the education system to everybody.
5 - He was not practical. He thought every crisis could be solved by talking peace, while the enemy is busy invading, raping and butchering civilians. Case in point, the DRC war. He opposed intervention in the war as 25,000 Ugandan and 6000 Rwandan soldiers advanced towards the capital. This is the kind of leader who would allow terrorists and invaders to cause mayhem, instead of countering the insurgency with military force.
6 - He was not much of a Pan Africanist. He took his orders from his western handlers. He was told what to say and do.
7 - He threw the struggle of black people under the bus, in favour of international celebrity status. Being feted by celebraties was more important to him than reforming his country.
8 - Results of Mandela's legacy can be seen today. A highly uneducated, destructive and violent population. Mass school dropouts. Highest crime rates in the world. Millions of people living in slums.
The answer is C) the spread of the Russian language and culture to the West
This began within the Soviet Satellite States of Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan etc. Where Russian culture and language was widely promoted.
After that, the <span>Russification </span>process moved further west in the Warsaw Pact States such of Poland, Hungary etc.
Even to this day, large populations in these countries speak the Russian language.
