Answer:
<u><em>This is because it is not unsustainable and also unfair in a democratic society. </em></u>
Explanation:
For decades now, most of US soldiers have some from a certain demographic. The age bracket, education and even race and even geography plays a big role.
For example, the North-East of the United States is the most densely population region in the country but produces far less recruits than the Southern parts of the country.
This not only creates a civilian-military divided, but can restrict the talent and skills the army is constantly recruiting for. The more diverse the pool of recruits, the better equipped the US army would be.
The correct answer is A. When the subject of a sentence is singular, add "_s" to the base form.
An easy example is "to exist", the base form is "exist" and A strawberry exists shows that you add s when a singular subject is used.
The correct answer for the given statement above would be option A. She will have been. The pronoun "she" is in the singular, third person. Other pronouns that are singular, third person include he, and it. And "will have been" is the conjugation of the verb "to be" in the future perfect tense.
Answer:
Motivational
Explanation:
There is no expression in the text for emotion.
Its not aggressive.
And no anger.
Answer + Explanation:
As the society grows more and more health conscious, stronger voices to ban smoking in all public areas begin to emerge. Banning public has been used as a mean for government to discourage smoking and also to improve city image. It is almost impossible to achieve consensus on this issue as it creates great inconvenience for the smokers. However, I believe smoking should be banned in public places and my reasons are as follow.
Looking at the <em>health aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because it is not only a health hazard for the smoker, it creates more harm to the others. Cigarette is a known carcinogen that has been associated with increased rates of lung cancer and heart disease. However, the hazard does not end there, second-hand smoke has been proven to create more detrimental effects on health on both the smokers and the people around them. This is especially harmful for those with weaker immune systems such as children and elderly.
Looking at the <em>sociological aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because smoking is a personal choice. One’s personal enjoyment should not be at the expense of others’ health. When a person smokes in indoor public areas such as restaurants and shopping centres, pollutants continue to circulate the premise and affecting the health of everyone within the building. It is unfair for the non-smokers to be forced to share the health risks of the smokers.
To sum up, public places are shared by all, smokers and non-smokers, old and young, and should be made friendly to all. <u>Negative effects of smoking go beyond the smoker himself, creating health problems of the public.</u> While some choose to accept the side effects of smoking, risks of smoking should not be forced upon others. Therefore, in my humble opinions, smoking should be banned in public places.
