Answer:
As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck, If a woodchuck could chuck wood.
Explanation: Heheh, I hope I helped!! <3
Answer:
The answer is declarative-semantic
Explanation:
I took the test and this is the correct answer.
Answer:
Their
Explanation:
The definition of pronoun is "a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse (e.g., I, you ) or to someone or something mentioned elsewhere in the discourse (e.g., she, it, this ).
"
I would say A
this is because it is formed more properly, it gives the best reason out of the options, and includes a thorough fact.
hope this helps
With the help of inductive reasoning, he reached the conclusion that segregation laws are all unjust.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the three part deductive statement, the major premise was all the laws that degrade the human personality are unjust. The minor premise was segregation laws degrade the human personality and therefore the conclusion was that the segregation laws are unjust.
This conclusion has been derived from the evidences like the hate filled policemen kick brothers and sisters. African American caught in an airtight prison of poverty. They were excluded from amusement parks. All this degraded the human personality and were unjust.
