Answer:
Some historians have seen the Crusades as a watershed event in Jewish history, marking the beginning of the deterioration of Jewish life in Europe in the Middle Ages. Other historians are skeptical of this claim and see other factors at work in the change in Jewish status. An examination of Jewish anti-Christian polemical literature reveals that the Crusades had an impact on the debate in three contexts: 1) the lack of consensus omnium that Christianity is the only true religion; 2) the lack of world peace as perceived by constant Christian wars; and 3) the Jewish willingness to undergo martyrdom as proof of the truth of Judaism. Nevertheless, the Crusades do not play a major role in the Jewish-Christian debate. From this fact it is possible to conclude that contemporary Jews did not perceive the Crusades as a major factor in their lives, and that the Jewish-Christian debate transcends particular historical events. /// [Abstract in Hebrew].
Journal Information
The purpose of Jewish History, the sole English language publication devoted exclusively to history and the Jews, is to broaden the limits of historical writing on the Jews. Jewish History publishes contributions in the field of history, but also in the ancillary fields of art, literature, sociology, and anthropology, where these fields and history proper cross paths. The diverse personal and professional backgrounds of Jewish History's contributors, a truly international meeting of minds, have enriched the journal and offered readers innovative essays, as well as special issues on topics proposed by guest-editors: women and Jewish inheritance, the Jews of Latin America, and Jewish self-imaging, to name but a few in a long list.
Explanation:
Sign or veto laws, control armed forces, and ask for written opinion from his cabinet
While individual plebeians, or freeborn Roman citizens outside the patrician, senatorial and equestrian classes, were able to gain economic power by amassing wealth and joining the equestrian class, their chances of joining the politically influential senatorial class were extremely remote. Collectively, however, plebeians were able to effect political and social change by forming a mob and rebelling against their social superiors.
I am not so sure about tge 2nd part
Asch's study on conformity, where participants had to make line judgments, can be best explained by the concept of Normative influence.
Normative Influence- Normative influence is the type of behavior in which individuals change their behavior thoughts and values to get the acceptance of others. This usually happens when the group has different norms and values and you are trying to get accepted in it.
In this type of conformity, the person has to act in accordance with prevailing social norms even though it is against their belief or norm.Social pressure compels a person to accept the norms
The consequences of not following the prevailing social norms can be in the form of social exclusion, punishment, and shaming, which will make a huge impact on the mental and social health of a person.
To learn more about the social influences please click on the link brainly.com/question/14923631
#SPJ4
