1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tju [1.3M]
3 years ago
6

To improve the conclusions from the analyzed data, the historian should include personal bias in his findings   True Or False 

History
1 answer:
antoniya [11.8K]3 years ago
7 0
<span>False. A historian should try to keep personal bias out of his/her conclusions. Some cultural bias is bound to sneak in however. </span>
You might be interested in
What online format is the most helpful for you? Whole class discussions, Breakout Rooms, working independently, etc.? What is he
Brut [27]

Me personally I like whole class because then I dont lose focus as easy

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What strategies were used for the d-day invasion
notsponge [240]

Answer:

D-Day called for one of the most critical spread and focus strategies in history. The Allies needed an entry into Europe that would maximize their chances of success while minimizing the risk to lives and military assets. The map of Europe prior to D-Day illustrates how they arrived at their brilliant solution.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How can the President check the actions of the legislative branch?
Vadim26 [7]

The correct answer is veto a bill passed by Congress.

In the American government, there are three branches to the federal government. These include the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Each of these branches has the ability to check the action/power of the other branches.

In this case, the executive branch (aka president) has the ability to stop a bill passed by Congress from becoming a law by using the power of the veto.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Originally, Egypt and Napata were friendly and traded goods.
Bingel [31]
Its true

i promise hope i could help
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Analyze how the Bill of Rights limits the powers of the federal government and state governments
Talja [164]
     The Federalists argued that they did not need a Bill of Rights because the people and states kept any powers that was not given to the Federal Government. On the other hand, Anti-Federalists said that a Bill of Rights was necessary in order to safeguard individual liberty. 
     The Bill of Rights is a list of limits on the Government. For example, the founders saw that the first amendment was a natural right and prohibits from making laws establishing religion and abridging (remove or shorten; rights or privileges) freedom of speech. 


Hope this Helps! (:
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the effect of the senate's vote of censure against McCarthy?
    10·2 answers
  • Why did Lewis and Clark follow the Missouri River ?
    7·2 answers
  • The winner of the popular vote in the election of 1824, though not the victor in the election, was
    9·1 answer
  • One item that was inspired by space research or exploration<br>​
    6·1 answer
  • Explain why a market economy offers more economic freedom and consumer choice?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following events first tested the U.S. policy of containment in Asia?
    12·2 answers
  • In the French and Indian war what river was imposter to the British
    8·2 answers
  • in wich region of texas did the Jumano live? A. Great plains B.Gulf coastal plain C.mountain and basins region D.Central plains​
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following best explains why bronze age technology is considered superior to neolithic technology
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following constitutes an unintended result of the Latin American revolutions? (5 points)
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!