1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna007 [38]
3 years ago
6

What is the primary source of uncertainty over the limits on presidential power? A.)Some presidents win their elections by great

er margins than others. B.)Constitutional amendments have greatly increased presidential powers. C.)The constitutional definition of executive powers is broad and unspecific. D.) Some presidents increase power in times of need.
History
1 answer:
faltersainse [42]3 years ago
4 0
The primary source of uncertainty over the limits on presidential power is that C. the <span>constitutional definition of executive powers is broad and unspecific.</span>
You might be interested in
What are the different theories on the death of Edger Allan Poe?
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

There are many therioes including, killed, ran over, drank too much alchol and got drunk.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.)
const2013 [10]

Answer:

hey iam bored pls join

ID: 724 645 3790

Password: 1111

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the decision of how much to produce depend upon?
cestrela7 [59]
The decision of the price of a good depends on its demand. You can not just produce a certain product without knowing the amount of demand in the market. The demand will depend on the buyer's willingness to pay for the goods. 

If you produce and produce products then it might bankrupt you because the price will be low because of the higher supply and no one is buying your product. 
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a factor in the United States dominating the world economy after World War II? 
weqwewe [10]
The correct answer to this question is option "A", I hope this answer has helped you.
7 0
3 years ago
How sympathetic should the revolutionary americans have been to the king-killing french revolution?
Agata [3.3K]
I surmise that at the outset, we ought to have had extraordinary sensitivity to the means being taken in the French Revolution since we had a considerable measure of similitudes in our current transformation and theirs. Yet, it was their King that helped us win our upset by sending troops to battle our war against the British. I don't imagine that is was ideal for us to betray him. We ought to have by one means or another had conciliatory relations to the progressive pioneers to stop the carnage. We didn't need to slaughter our lord to set up our nation, I figure we could have mediated to stop the losses of the French Revolution.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Picture of the most common method Empire Builders used to unite vast territories
    15·1 answer
  • Why did japan institute the Treaty of Kanagawa
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes Nazism?
    5·1 answer
  • Compare the
    12·1 answer
  • What do Muslims believe the Quran is?
    10·1 answer
  • How would you describe anthony's attitude toward women gaining the right to vote ?
    14·1 answer
  • How will these differences between Martin Luther and the pope be resolved?
    8·1 answer
  • What are the outcomes of WW1​
    6·1 answer
  • I need help plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
    8·2 answers
  • Help me to answer this please number 3,4 &amp; 5 thanks
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!