I think it is (C) Most Mexicans remained poor while Americans invested in Mexico's unfair economy
... the market for web browser market.
At the beginning of the 1990s, Microsoft bundled its Internet Explorer web browser within its Windows operating system which helped it acquire a dominant position in the web browser market. From Microsoft’s point of view, putting these two products together was a way to be “user-friendly” for those consumers that were not computer savvy. The company reasoned that due to innovation and competition, both products had become essentially one, and thanks to this synergy it provided consumers with double the benefits for free. Competitors, such as Netscape, stated that the browser was a distinct and separate product so there was no reason for it to be automatically bundled with its operating system. Further, Microsoft was accused of altering its application programming interfaces to favor Internet Explorer.
The Open Door Policy is a term in foreign affairs initially used to refer to the United States policy established in the late 19th century and the early 20th century, as enunciated in Secretary of State John Hay's Open Door Note, dated September 6, 1899 and dispatched to the major European powers.[1] The policy proposed to keep China open to trade with all countries on an equal basis, keeping any one power from total control of the country, and calling upon all powers, within their spheres
Answer:
Dissenters
Explanation:
The term dissenters was widely used in 17th and 18th centuries. Generally, these dissenters were only a group of people that opposed the states' intervention to personal religious matters. (At that time, England wanted the church to be heavily involved in all political decisions).
But, many church officials at that time blatantly categorized these dissenters as someone who oppose the church and Christianity as a whole to diminish public support for them.
It was a reaction from the colonist for Great Britain taxing the colonies so much. It led to more tension because it was a straight forward act against Great Britain, and one that was slightly violet. It was showing Great Britain that the colonist were definitely fed up with how they were being traeted by the mother country.
