The Mexican government knew it needed to settle Texas, so when a guy named Moses Austin approached them asking for permission to bring American settlers in, the mexicans approved it. Moses would die before he could bring the settlers in, but his son, Stephen F. Austin, led three hundred families into Texas. Many more would follow.
South region
Southern region has the largest numeric 1.0 million and perfentage 0.8 growth
Answer:
C. The breakup of Yugoslavia led to ethnic cleaning and conflicts.
Explanation:
The breakup of Yugoslavia and the appearance of several republics representing the nationalities that integrated the previous countries (Serbs, Montenegrans, Croatians, Eslovenes) contributed to the rise of regimes with nationalist background and whose speech encouraged the genocide of other neighboring nations. The most sound case was Serbia, which was ruled by Slodoban Milosevic, whose regime endorse the idea of annexing parts of the former Yugoslavia to create the Great Serbia.
The right answer is C.
Answer: It bolstered the US claim to the states of Oregon and Washington that exist today.
Explanation: The Crucial Role of the Expedition The Lewis and Clark Expedition had several accomplishments.
As a result, the imperial struggle for control of North America, particularly in the Pacific Northwest, was changed.
It bolstered the US claim to the states of Oregon and Washington that exist today. It bolstered the US claim to the states of Oregon and Washington that exist today.
Hello there and thank you for joining Brainly, first of all. :)
Coming from a perspective of society and civilians, war is always unavoidable. However, there is a fine line between what is known as war and what conflict would be. And conflict, in most terms, is defined as complications. Complications can be resolved without further action, like war. That is, through discussions and government.
Throughout history, we've heard of Crusades, and wars between these two unsettling countries. One, however, is struggling through poverty, and one.. well, lets just say is a powerful force. So, to help explain what the issue is between the two countries - both seemingly claim Jerusalem (or the holy land) as theirs. Multiple minor issues have arose between the times, but most of the conflict seems to be in a strip on Palestine's end called "Gaza". Also known as where the two meet for war. Other areas struggle as well, but to sum this all up, civilians live in places where war is going on. That, right there, is war crime. And war crime on both ends since both did not find a solution to their arguments and disputes. Considering residents of both countries live there, that is also a complete disaster.
So, moving on the question. Because the lack of accurate information has stung everyone, we don't quite know who is the right hand of this argument. Neither do we know under who's ownership the holy land is for sure, and who is sincerely belongs to.
However, we can say that the dispute is avoidable under a circumstance. That is, to either
1) Share the holy land, and unite as a state (which would be quite a difficulty considering both are of different religions)
2) Have one take it over (and that won't happen soon, in my view. Both hold is tightly and yearn for it strongly).
Since both are terribly rare solutions, we can come to the conclusion that the conflict is unavoidable. Both believe it is their right to claim it, and all we can say is: May peace be embedded soon. I really hate seeing headlines that speak of more people dying and no one is doing anything about it. It hurts me greatly.
I hope this helps you. Of course, this question is based off of a personal point of view. If this was explained it your class, and your instructor gave a direct answer to this question, you should probably trust your teacher because I'm no politician. (soon to be, though)
Please forgive me for any grammatical errors or spelling mistakes.
Thank you! :) I enjoyed answering this one.
