Opened ocean trade routes to India

History

1 answer:

morpeh [17]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The Indian Ocean trade routes connected Southeast Asia, India, Arabia, and East Africa, beginning at least as early as the third century BCE. ... Domestication of the camel helped bring coastal trade goods such as silk, porcelain, spices, incense, and ivory to inland empires, as well. Enslaved people were also traded.

Muslim

But despite this diversity, for the most part, especially on the Western half of the Indian Ocean basin, the trade was dominated by Muslim merchants. Why? Largely because they had the money to build ships, although we will see that in the 15th century, the Chinese state could have changed that balance completely.

You might be interested in

Competing views of the responsibilities of governments (federal, state, and local). American Revolution/Constitution

kogti [31]

1, communism
2, political views meant choosing sidea

7 0

3 years ago

Using the image provided, what type of housing does this represent that developed during this time

vlabodo [156]

Answer:

Apartment Housing

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Using complete sentences, explain how the Chinese communists were treated under the rule of Chiang Kai-shek.

natta225 [31]

Answer:

Communists were treated badly, as Chiang Kai-shek consider them his main enemy in the country. He decided to fight against them in to destroy them. That is why he gathered a large army with a task to surround them and destroy them. Communists who were outnumbered decided to flee, which led to the famous Long March, a 6 000 mile long journey towards the North.

Explanation:

Around 100 000 Communist were running in front Chiang Kai-shek's army. A lot of them died due to awful conditions during the journey.

Those who survived settled in northwestern China, in caves where they started recreating the Communist movement.

7 0

3 years ago

Explain why the Articles of Confederation proved too weak to meet the needs of the 13 new states. Describe at least two examples

Elodia [21]

The Articles of Confederation were far too weak to meet the needs of the newly created United States because of the massive decentralization the Articles contained.

They did not give the government any right to tax the people, and had to ask the states for taxes, and the states were not keen to pay them unless it benefited them. Often found were states not contributing to the pay of the Continental Army because it was not in their territory and defending them. This was also the reason Valley Forge was a disastrous winter for the Continental Army.

The Constitution fixed this by mandating budgets and making sure the states did in fact pay dues to the Gov't, later amended with (the supposed temporary) Federal income tax, starting after The Great War.

The other big failure is the lack of a requirement delegates be there, and the fact it requires every state to vote yes, an amendment to let the Confederation place import taxes to help pay the army was a washed failure because Rhode Island feared having their economy impacted horribly as they were so small they only had trade.

The New Constitution fixed this by making it so 3/4 of the states had to vote Aye to an amendment to the Constitution itself, and made the Federal Government itself handle passes legislation at it's own level with a majority rules, rather than all.

A four episode series from Extra History delve with a good amount of detail as to the Articles' other short comings, and what I elaborated on. Would strongly recommend a watch: https://youtu.be/C6rHSiN0vKk

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is the best example of a command economy? *

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

B Stalin's five year plans in the Soviet Union

8 0

3 years ago