Pancho Villa has been characterized as a great leader in the troops he led during the Mexican Revolution, for this reason he is perceived as one of the people with great attitudes and skills to be a great leader, an issue that was noticeable when seeing how people he was involved and participated in different acts always supporting this character in his fight. The leadership that Francisco Villa exercised was sometimes participatory, first communicating the problems to them, then expressing their proposals, discussing what they could or had to do at the end of the day to make a decision, which almost always depended on him and choosing the indicated and precise option.
He executed an autocratic leadership since he assumed in various issues all the responsibility of making decisions, he said how they would address the opponents when they would start and when the fighting would end, motivated them with words of encouragement for them and their families especially by protecting their interests, their honor and their integrity.
Another of the leaderships executed by Pancho was the democratic one since the intervention he had in the people regarding the improvement of his conditions and the struggle he faced from enemies in order to free Mexicans from slavery. He was a leader always focused on his group, he directed his guerrillas without hesitation and with all the determination, he did not need to gather people to support him, people would be with him in order to be part of their squads, since they motivated their proposals and vision towards liberation from slavery and the improvement of the people and their families in every way, people had it in a concept of a smart person.
Answer:
<h2>
The Louisiana Purchase
</h2>
<em>[You didn't show the map, but that's the probable answer.]
</em>
Explanation:
President Thomas Jefferson commissioned James Monroe and Robert Livingston to negotiate a deal with France to acquire New Orleans or all or part of Florida. When they went to France to negotiate, Monroe and Livingston found that Napoleon was ready to sell a much wider range of territory to the United States, to finance his European wars. Napoleon was asking $22 million for the whole territory that became the Louisiana Purchase. The US team negotiated the price down to $15 million.
Then there was a constitutional crisis back home: Did the President have the authority under the constitution to make such a major addition to the nation's territory and spend the nation's funds to do so? Jefferson himself initially thought a constitutional amendment might be necessary to authorize such a large action. Ultimately, Jefferson simply sought approval of the purchase from Congress. He used this analogy to describe what his administration was doing on behalf of the country: "“It is the case of a guardian, investing the money of his ward in purchasing an important adjacent territory; and saying to him when of age, I did this for your good."
the central plateau is the heartland of mexico
Answer:
The main outcome was the return of Russia as an independent country together with Belarus and Ukraine. That happened in December 1991. The three states formed the CIS, or Commonwealth of Independent States. The exit of Russia from the Soviet Union was a mortal blow to the Communist state that had existed since 1917 (though the formal name of Soviet Union was adopted in 1922). The breakup of the USSR is the end of the Cold War.
Explanation:
