256.
EXPLANATION:
When you are using exponents, you are basically just doing repeated multiplication.
Whatever the exponent (smaller number is) is how many times you multiply the base number by itself.
So 4 ^4 is 4 x 4 x 4 x 4. (4 fours.)
So 4 x 4 x 4 x 4 is 256.
HAVE A GUD DAY
Answer:
2/3<9/10; I used 3/4 as a benchmark.
Step-by-step explanation:
2/3<1/2; I used 1/2 as a benchmark.
2/3 = 0.(20/3) = 0.667
1/2 = 0.(10/2) = 0.5
So this is wrong, as 0.667 > 0.5.
1/2=3/5; I used 1/4 as a benchmark.
1/2 = 0.(10/2) = 0.5
3/5 = 0.(30/5) = 0.6
0.5 != 0.6, so this is wrong.
2/3<9/10; I used 3/4 as a benchmark.
2/3 = 0.(20/3) = 0.667
9/10 = 0.(90/10) = 0.9
So this is correct, as 0.667 < 0.9
3/4<2/3; I used 1/2 as a benchmark.
3/4 = 0.(30/4) = 0.75
2/3 = 0.(20/3) = 0.667
0.75 > 0.667, so this is wrong.
Answer: i think (4n+1)^2(4n-1)^2 isnt a multiple of 8 for all integers of n because:
(4n + 1)²(4n - 1)²
= [(4n + 1)(4n - 1)]²
= (16n² - 1)²
= 16².n².n² - 2.16.n² + 1
= 8n²(32n² - 4) + 1
can see 8n²(32n² - 4) is a multiple of 8 but 1 isnt a multiple of 8
=> (4n + 1)²(4n - 1)² isnt a multiple of 8 for all integers of n.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
i hope i have been useful buddy.
good luck ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️.
