Answer:
<em>The invisible hand concept</em>
Explanation:
The invisible hand concept is a metaphor which describes the actions of a person who performs certain tasks for his own benefit but his actions also lead to being a help for the public or a society.
In the scenario, mentioned in the question, Sergio wanted to earn a nice amount of profit for himself by setting up a consulting business. In his effort to do this, he benefited the society by helping them with their computer problems. Hence, this is an example of invisible hand concept.
In an experiment, the process of random assignment ensures that each participant has an equal chance of being in either the control group or the experimental group.
Random assignment refers to the use of random methods in psychological experiments to equalize the chances of each participant being assigned to a particular group. Participants in the study will be divided into various groups at random, such as an experimental group or a treatment group.
Tossing a coin, picking a name out of a hat, rolling dice, or giving players random numbers are just a few examples of random assignment techniques. Remember that random assignment is distinct from random selection. Random assignment describes how those chosen participants are then assigned to experimental groups, whereas random selection describes how people are picked at random to represent the greater community.
Know more about random assignment here
brainly.com/question/9423006
#SPJ4
Answer:
it impacted my sleep and grades
It can thin out the ozone layer
Answer: True
Explanation: The Supreme Court admitted that it is haphazard to treat similar things differently and that mandatory death penalty statutes eliminated this problem, but also reckless to treat two different things the same way. In essence, to impose the same penalty on all convicted murderers, even though all defendants
are different, is just as capricious as imposing a penalty randomly.
To relieve this problem, some sentencing guidelines became necessary. This gave rise to the guided discretion statutes that set standards for juries and judges to
use when deciding whether to impose the death penalty. The Court reasoned that, guided discretion statutes struck a reasonable balance between giving the jury some discretion and allowing it to consider the defendant's background and character and the circumstances surrounding the crime.
