Considering the assertions made by Peter N. Stearns, the reasons he provided in defense of his
assertion that history is useful in the world of work includes "<u>studying history leads to the good upbringing of businesspeople, professionals, and political leaders.</u><u>"</u>
<h3>Some other reasons Peter N. Stearns provided are:</h3>
- Student history helps build people in professions like law and public administration.
- It helps in analysis skills.
- It improves the proficiency to find and analyze sources of information.
- Studying history helps to recognize and assess diverse interpretations, etc.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are various reasons Peter N. Stearns, gave on how history is useful in the world of work.
Learn more about the benefits of History here: brainly.com/question/2875725
The second sentence sounds correct...
<span>The Great was retained because it <span>merged proposals from large states and small states about congressional
apportionment. Eventually, the main contribution was in defining the
apportionment of the senate, and thus retaining a federal character in the constitution.
It was proposed that the proportion of suffrage in the 1st. branch [house]
should depend on the respective numbers of free people. It added that for the second branch or
Senate, each State should have no more than one vote. Though this plan failed it was finally
resolved and an amended version of this plan was included. Benjamin Franklin made modifications so that
each state big or small was represented in the senate. The Three-Fifths Compromise was no longer
retained because it focused whether or not to include slaves in the total population
count and victory in the Civil War ended slavery making it null.</span></span>
The Selective Service Act of 1917 or Selective Draft Act authorized the United States federal government to raise a national army for service in World War I through conscription