Answer:
First and foremost, a limited and smaller government is less expensive. The less we look to government to solve problems, the less we as taxpayers have to pay. We the people pay for these programs, including employee salaries and benefits.
Secondly, a smaller, limited government cuts down on waste, fraud and inefficiency. With so many agencies, how can anyone keep track of all that goes on? And with all the bureaucracy, how does anything even get done? Where is the accountability? And with all these agencies, departments and commissions, one can only imagine the duplication of services, not to mention the unnecessary ones.
Explanation:
"A new document that created the first US government" best describes the Articles of Confederation.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Articles of Confederation is defined as the first constitution established in the U.S.A. It was originally formed for the thirteen colonies of the U.S.A with an aim of preserving the sovereignty and independent nature of the thirteen colonies.
However, the Articles of Confederation led the central government to be weak as it gave a lot of autonomy and authority to the colonies on an individual basis. It is nothing but a new document form initiated to create US government firstly.
Explanation:
I think it is not unfair to have 2 parties, but I think people with differing views on each party should have another way to express their political opinions. I also think that the American public would benefit form more politcal parties in the house and the senate because they would bring more to the table. To elaborate on the statement above I think the legislative branch would be able to expand and tackle more issues that are affecting lots of americans by having multiple points of view form different polotical parties.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Weather the government changes its policy.