Answer:
It is likely that the genomic sequences that were used did not enable to properly observe the evolutionary relationships among the species analyzed
Explanation:
The homology level between the genomic sequences may be too low to separate species that are phylogenetically related. In these cases, it is necessary to make a genetic analysis of the sequences that are used before the phylogenetic analysis
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
incoming Paleoindians, the first Americans, who allegedly hunted them to extinction.
 
        
             
        
        
        
It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.
There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.
There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:
-  no mutation
 -  random mating
 -  no gene flow
 -  infinite population size
 -  and no selection (natural nor forced). 
 
You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.
For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.
Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.
If you want to learn more, you can read:
brainly.com/question/19431143
 
        
             
        
        
        
<span>The region of Poland has suffered from the few limits of European states with respect to the international politics of the 20th century. The variations of the borders of Poland is due to the absence of natural barriers in the east-west. The extension of the border is the cause of constant changes in stability that have shaken the country and the inhabitants.</span>
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Traits included physical features such as flower color. Today, these factors are called <u>alleles</u>.  Mendel developed the hypothesis that some factors could be dominant, while others were <u>recessive</u>. According to his theory, a dominant factor is expressed when <u>only one factor is presen</u>t in the offspring. On the other hand, a <u>recessive</u> factor expresses its <u>phenotype</u> when <u>both factors are present</u> in the offspring. Today, the term<u> genotype </u>refers to the combination of factors possessed by an organism.
- alleles
 - recessive 
 - only one factor is present  
 - recessive
 - phenotype
 - both factors are present  
 - genotype