Im pretty sure the answer your looking for is Tenskwatawa . Hope that helps :-)
The correct answer is B.
The Schenk case dealt with Schenk encouraging people to avoid the military draft during World War I. He was arrested but argued that his first amendment freedom of speech was violated. After making its way through state and local courts, the case made it all the way to the Supreme Court. However, the court ruled it was NOT protected by the first amendment right of freedom of speech. This is because it caused a clear danger to the US war effort, which could cause the US to lose World War I.
To help the german recieve political help the the stonger powers like russia or prussia but instead to reclaim lands lost to foreign nation years before
When analyzing a source historians want to remain NEUTRAL in other words they don't want to be PERSUADED by personal feelings and options they know the different sources may reveal different OPINIONS
