Answer:
No
Explanation:
<em>Delighted </em>isn't an abstract noun, it's an adjective.
An abstract noun is something that isn't concrete. You cannot detect it with your physical senses.
However, <em>delight</em> is an abstract noun.
<span>“A book sealed,” a reference to the Bible, is called an - a. Allusion. It's a form of speech that refers to the object but not directly, it hides its real meaning. It's up to you to find out what one or another allusion means. Allusion is commonly used in parody.</span>
<span>by comparing how the space station is viewed from space with how it is viewed by people on Earth is the answer hope this helps and give me brainiest and add me as a friend.</span>
Jakovlevitch is not so much astounded by the fact that he found a nose in a baked roll as he is frightened by the fact that it is a familiar nose, and an official one - belonging to the Collegiate Assessor Kovalev. So, this is a nose with a rank - not high enough to please its owner, but higher than Jakovlevitch's modest social position. Jakovlevitch is afraid: he must have cut off the nose while he was drunk!
Gogol uses the nose to satirize obsessions of Russian society with rank and social status. Kovalev himself is apparently unsatisfied with his status as a civil servant (and that is all he cares about). So, when he sees his nose in a uniform which implies a higher status, he doesn't know what to do, how to behave. He acts as a sycophant. "'How, even so, am I to approach it?' Kovalev reflected. 'Everything about it, uniform, hat, and all, seems to show that it is a State Councilor now. Only the devil knows what is to be done!' He started to cough in the Nose's vicinity, but the Nose did not change its position for a single moment."
Answer:
The hoax is the Mystery of the Bathtub
Explanation:
- The bathtub hoax was a famous hoax perpetrated by the American journalist H. L. Mencken involving the publication of a fictitious history of the bathtub.
- The article claimed that the bathtub had been invented by Lord John Russell of England in 1828, and that Cincinnatian Adam Thompson became acquainted with it during business trips there in the 1830s.
- Mencken grew concerned of people taking his article seriously, comparing it in acceptance to the Norman conquest.
- The article was entirely false but was still being widely quoted as fact for years, even as recently as January 2008 when a Kia TV ad referenced the story with no mention of its fictional nature.
