The width of the rectangle is
unit
Step-by-step explanation:
The given is:
- A rectangles width is 4 less than its area
- Its length is 19 units
We need to find the width of the rectangle
Assume that the width of the rectangle is x units
∵ The area of the rectangle = length × width
∵ The width of the rectangle = x units
∵ The length of the rectangle = 19 units
∴ The area of the square = 19 × x = 19 x units²
∵ The width of the rectangle is 4 less than its area
- That means subtract 4 from the area to find the width
∴ x = 19 x - 4
- Subtract 19 x from both sides
∴ -18 x = -4
- Divide both sides by -18
∴ x = data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1143f/1143f3e29cf6f915f28f4de0756935ce8cba9e9c" alt="\frac{-4}{-18}"
- Reduce the fraction by dividing up and down by -2
∴ x = data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8baf/b8bafe81f53c616a7ab8fc5d9a04a0e697478378" alt="\frac{2}{9}"
The width of the rectangle is
unit
Learn more:
You can learn more about the rectangles in brainly.com/question/12919591
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
A: 180° B: 360° C: 540°
Step-by-step explanation:
A: The measures of interior angles of a triangle sum to 180°. Since figure ABC is a triangle, the interior angles of figure ABC sum to 180°.
B: We can see the quadrilateral ACDE is a trapezoid. If you can see, the trapezoid can be split into two triangles if you connect points C and E. As U mentioned before, the measures of interior angles of a triangle sum to 180°. Since we know figure ACDE can be split into <u>two triangles</u> we have to do: 180x2 which is 360°.
C: Now that we know the Pentagon ABCDE can be split into 3 triangles(1 from figure ABC and 2 from figure ACDE), we have to multiply 180 by 3 because like I mentioned before, the measures of interior angles of a triangle sum to 180°. So, 180x3=540°.
The 1st graph has vertex in (-3, -3) which can be translated into
Horizontal shift left 3
Vertical shift down 3
Other than that, the graph shows y=x^2 so it wasn't compressed or stretched
The 2nd graph has vertex in (0, 0) which mean there is no vertical and horizontal shift. But the graph is facing down and it was slimmer than y=x^2 graph. When x=1, the result is y=3 which was 3 times more than it supposed to be.
The graph must be:
Reflection across x-axis
Vertical stretch of 3
The 3rd graph has vertex in (3, -3) which can be translated into
Horizontal shift right 3
Vertical shift down 3
Same as the 1st graph, the 3rd graph shows y=x^2 so it wasn't compressed or stretched.
If ZM is an obtuse angle (greater than 90), then ZM and ZP will not add up to 90.
If ZP is 120, then ZM and ZP will not add up to 90.
There are multiple contradicting statements within this problem, as noted above.
Hope this helps!