1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bazaltina [42]
2 years ago
12

Thomas Gibbons won the case Gibbons v. Ogden in 1824 because he was doing business in more than one state. held state licenses f

rom more than one state. was trying to reduce air pollution. held a federal license to do business.
History
2 answers:
ASHA 777 [7]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Thomas Gibbons won the case Gibbons v. Ogden in 1824 because he <em><u>held a federal license to do business.</u></em>

Explanation:

The Supreme Court case of Gibbons v. Ogden was a case of a territorial issue where the two parties tried to gain superior authority over the rights involved. This court case set the precedent for how state and federal powers are entertained.

Aaron Ogden and Thomas Gibbons were former partners in the steamboat industry. So, when Gibbons got his own steamboat to operate, the issue of who can ply in the waterways became an issue. Ogden has a state permit while Gibbons's was a federal permit.

When Gibbons operates his steamboat on the waterways of New York, Ogden opposed, claiming that Gibbons has no permit. This case became a fight between the state and federal powers, with the issue of who was to have a higher power. And the court agreed or dictated that the federal government has control or precedence over the state.

So, <u>Gibbons won the case because of his federal licence against Ogden's state licence</u>.

Harman [31]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

d

Explanation:

You might be interested in
20 POINTS! FIRST TO ANSWER ***CORRECTLY*** GETS BRAINLIEST!
alexgriva [62]

Answer:

 Wellness in Africa to win! Entries close: 15 April



Indo-Aryan migrations

Language

Download PDF

Watch

Edit

The Indo-Aryan migrations[note 1] were the migrations into the Indian subcontinent of Indo-Aryan peoples, an ethnolinguistic group that spoke Indo-Aryan languages, the predominant languages of today's North India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and the Maldives. Indo-Aryan population movements into the region and Anatolia (ancient Mitanni) from Central Asia are considered to have started after 2000 BCE, as a slow diffusion during the Late Harappan period, which led to a language shift in the northern Indian subcontinent. The Iranian languages were brought into the Iranian plateau by the Iranians, who were closely related to the Indo-Aryans.

The Proto-Indo-Iranian culture, which gave rise to the Indo-Aryans and Iranians, developed on the Central Asian steppes north of the Caspian Sea as the Sintashta culture (2200[2][3][4]–1800 BCE)[5][6][7][8] in present-day Russia and Kazakhstan, and developed further as the Andronovo culture (2000–900 BCE),[9] around the Aral Sea.

The Indo-Aryans split off around 2000 BCE to 1600 BCE from the Iranians,[10] and migrated southwards to the Bactria-Margiana Culture, from which they borrowed their distinctive religious beliefs and practices. From the BMAC, the Indo-Aryans migrated into Anatolia and, possibly in multiple waves, the Punjab (northern Pakistan and India), while the Iranians, starting ca. 800 BCE, moved into Iran, both bringing with them the Indo-Iranian languages.

Migration by an Indo-European people was first hypothesized in the late 18th century, following the discovery of the Indo-European language family, when similarities between western and Indian languages had been noted. Given these similarities, a single source or origin was proposed, which was diffused by migrations from some original homeland

Explanation:

am i right

7 0
3 years ago
What problems after the war caused Shay’s Rebellion?
lapo4ka [179]

Answer: well after shays rebellion Massachusetts legislature enacted laws easing the economic condition of debtors.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Philosopher whose ideas of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness
Marat540 [252]

Answer:Locke

Thomas Jefferson took the phrase “pursuit of happiness” from Locke and incorporated it into his famous statement of a peoples' inalienable right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” in the Declaration of Independence.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What was one negative effect of the growth of cities in the late 1800s?
saul85 [17]

Answer:

Pollution

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a __________ economy, most businesses are privately owned, but the government regulates utilities, builds roads and bridges,
Talja [164]
In a mixed economy
Not just capitalism
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What influenced the difference between the colonies in New England, the middle continental colonies, and the southern colonies?
    8·1 answer
  • What accounts for Vladimir Putin’s power in Russia?
    15·2 answers
  • How does the reader best know that Louis Pasteur was very brave?
    13·1 answer
  • Did Smith think that increased global contact was generally a good thing or a bad thing? How does he make his opinion on this cl
    5·1 answer
  • What did painters experiment with during the Harlem renaissance
    7·1 answer
  • What characterization of talks with Iran did McCain blame on Obama? Diplomatic Weak Without pre-condition Extremist
    15·1 answer
  • Name six things colonist hoped life would be like after the revolution?
    7·1 answer
  • Whar happens to energy in food molecules during cellular respiration?
    8·1 answer
  • What did the passage of legislation in the articles of confederation establish
    7·1 answer
  • All of the following are considered types of resources EXCEPT —
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!