Try to look at the brighter side. if you’re in a situation (for example) where you are waiting for test results, don’t think about the bad possibilities that could happen but more of what good could happen. try to keep an open mind and but don’t ignore the truth.
stop looking back at your past!! you can’t do anything about it and you never will! it’s in the past for a reason. all you can do is keep living in the present and live your life.
it’s gonna take some time to care less about the world but eventually you’ll get there. you just have to understand how special you are and how most things that you are insecure or worried about don’t matter. you also have to let go of letting everything be perfect and your job IS NOT to please everyone except yourself. and try to find yourself and who you really are :)
Answer:
A semicolon can be used to combine two closely related independent clauses if they are not already joined by a coordinating conjunction (and, but, or, nor, for, so, or yet).
A poet is a person who creates poetry. Poets may describe themselves as such or be described as such by others. A poet may simply be a writer of poetry, or may perform their art to an audience.( am not sure what you meant by “ according to her website” because their is no website or anything. So I just put you the definition of a poet)
This 'short essay' is basically asking you create a piece of writing, convincing your audience of your point. For example; I firmly believe that every single country should not have nuclear bombs. In general, I'd include:
*Nuclear Bomb Simulator to give an image I how much damage it does. What this does is, people tend to hate destructive behaviours. By showing them how much damage it does, you're appealing to their sense of emotion by conjuring a sense of panic.
*Death counts from previous wars to further reinforce the emotion of panic, sadness, and awareness. Death count for those individuals who demand solid scientific evidence.
In a nutshell, basically, include statistics (supports your argument with logical data that's already proven), history from past events if possible (to appeal to one's emotions), and if possible, choose evidence that's more modernized to further prove your point. Why so? Simply because it proves that the problem still persists, no matter how advanced in technology we are. in this case, nuclear bombs are going to be dangerous, regardless of how "modernized" we all are.
