<span>The
experience of the new immigrants was different. By 1890, no more free
land was available, so newcomers found jobs in city factories. They
lived in crowded neighborhoods, where everyone shared a common language
and culture.
Hope this helped :)
</span>
Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.
United Nations, Great Britain, France
It would be a "proportional" tax rate system that uses the same rate for all income levels, although in most western countries this is not used. Instead a "progressive" tax structure is used.
Answer:
Our aim... is to build up the confidence of the whole communist party and the entire people in the certain triumph of the revolution... We must... raise the political consciousness of the entire people so that they may willingly and gladly fight together with us for victory. We should fire the whole people with the conviction that China belongs not to the reactionaries but to the Chinese people... We firmly believe that, led by the Chinese Communist Party... the Chinese people will achieve complete victory.
Explanation:
