1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Morgarella [4.7K]
3 years ago
15

Why did the japanese invasion of manchuria weaken the league of nations? plz help

History
2 answers:
Kaylis [27]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It showed that the League of Nations did not have the power to stop countries from unlawful attacks. It gave Hitler and Musslini the confidince to attack anywhere they wanted without and consequence. The Great Powers of the League  were unwilling use force against Japan, because of the self interest of a Great power (Britain) in Japans actions. ... This weakened the League, as the League could not take any action against Japan since a Great Power of the League secretly supported its actions.

Explanation:

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: The Japanese invasion of Manchuria began on 18 September 1931, when the Kwantung Army of the Empire of Japan invaded Manchuria immediately following the Mukden Incident. At war’s end in February of 1932, the Japanese established the puppet state of Manchukuo. Their occupation lasted until the success of the Soviet Union and Mongolia with the Manchurian Strategic Offensive Operation in mid-August of 1945.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Frederick Douglass perceived the concept of "wage-slavery" to be silly and wholly incomparable with chattel slavery. True Flase
galben [10]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

he wanted slaves to be paid?

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the time frame for the Renaissance?
mixas84 [53]

Answer:14th century to 17th century

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What kind of government would an anarchist support
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

A lawlessness society and government

Explanation:

An Anarchist is someone who does not obey law and order, who disregards social norms and rules of established authority. An Anarchist may be described as someone who rejects the laid down laws and order of a given society. An Anarchist does not believe in the society being regularized by laws and order. Anarchists are those against political authority, people capable of creating anarchy in a society, reject all forms of hierarchical control by the authority. Anarchy is therefore a state constituted without laws and order, rules and social norms, a society without ruler. A state of Anarchy is a lawless society where there is no government, no constitution, lay down laws and orders are not complied with, no morality whatsoever, people who commit crime and walk freely in the society and go unpunished, that is, where there is no justice in the society, people’s fundamental rights are violated, people’s property attacked.

Pierre Joseph Proudhon, a French political writer and socialist was said to be the first person to willingly call himself an anarchist.

The kind of government an Anarchist will support is that government without constitution, law and order, that government that allows people to violate the laid down rules and social norms, that allows people to go against the political authority, government that allows self-governing of people and society consensus, that is, allows people to do what they want without questioning by the government, that guarantees individual’s right of liberty, a government that allows political power and resources to be shared equally by all in a given society.

4 0
3 years ago
NEED ASAP I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST Why would punishments for breaking the law be different for corporations and individuals?
algol13

Answer: D, Individuals could not afford as large a fine as corporations could.

Explanation:

A and D are good answers but D is the one which is the most different between them. Individuals cannot afford to pay a large fine while corporations can. The U.S. justice system is more susceptible to heft a fine on corporations than average citizens.

7 0
3 years ago
Primary Source Analysis—Sam Houston's Report of the Battle of San Jacinto How many Mexicans died in the battle?
Sonbull [250]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

On April 25, 1836, General Sam Houston, commander-in-chief of the Texan Army, wrote his official report about the Battle of San Jacinto, close to Houston, Texas.

The report was addressed to D.G. Burnett, President of the Republic of Texas.

According to the report, 630 Mexican soldiers died in the battle, 208 were wounded and 730 captured.

This official Houston report can be found in the Archives of the State Library in Austin, Texas.

On April 21, 1836, the Texan troops led by General Sam Houston defeated the Mexican troops led by General Antonio López de Santana.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was NOT true about the economy at the end of World War II
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the Britain, France, and the United States embrace the policy of appeasement?
    9·2 answers
  • North africa was invaded, taken and plundered in the 430s by
    8·1 answer
  • At what point could the United States no longer avoid involvement in World War II?
    7·2 answers
  • Mark each statement if it is an advantage of Byzantium's location.
    13·2 answers
  • Petra owns a coffee shop. She has ten employees.In 2007, she paid her employees minimum wage ($5.85 an hour).In 2008, the minimu
    15·1 answer
  • What did ishmeal mean when he said he lived in three worlds?​
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not required to be an American citizen according to the 1790 Naturalization Act.
    14·1 answer
  • Many Progressives opposed social Darwinism because it promoted the idea that -
    11·1 answer
  • Step 1- Select three sites to review:
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!