Why did the japanese invasion of manchuria weaken the league of nations? plz help

History

2 answers:

Kaylis [27]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

It showed that the League of Nations did not have the power to stop countries from unlawful attacks. It gave Hitler and Musslini the confidince to attack anywhere they wanted without and consequence. The Great Powers of the League were unwilling use force against Japan, because of the self interest of a Great power (Britain) in Japans actions. ... This weakened the League, as the League could not take any action against Japan since a Great Power of the League secretly supported its actions.

Explanation:

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]3 years ago

3 0

Answer: The Japanese invasion of Manchuria began on 18 September 1931, when the Kwantung Army of the Empire of Japan invaded Manchuria immediately following the Mukden Incident. At war’s end in February of 1932, the Japanese established the puppet state of Manchukuo. Their occupation lasted until the success of the Soviet Union and Mongolia with the Manchurian Strategic Offensive Operation in mid-August of 1945.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

How did southern democrats reverse gains made during reconstruction in each of these areas?

Molodets [167]

Southern Democrats found loopholes in several different laws that allowed them to limit the rights gained by former slaves during the era of Reconstruction.

A perfect example of this would be the requirements/obligations put in place to limit former slaves from voting. This included the development of literacy/citizen tests, poll taxes, and the grandfather clause. The tests given were often near impossible to pass, the poll taxes were ridiculously expensive, and the grandfather clause stopped individuals from voting based on whether or not their grandfather could vote. All of these laws lasted several years before their repeal.

6 0

3 years ago

What was the Cold War? How did the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union change after World War II?

melamori03 [73]

Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. Although the United States embarked on a famine relief program in the Soviet Union in the early 1920s and American businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the New Economic Policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. By that time, the totalitarian nature of Joseph Stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the West. Although World War II brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward Eastern Europe had created tensions even before the war ended.

The Soviet Union and the United States stayed far apart during the next three decades of superpower conflict and the nuclear and missile arms race. Beginning in the early 1970s, the Soviet regime proclaimed a policy of détente and sought increased economic cooperation and disarmament negotiations with the West. However, the Soviet stance on human rights and its invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 created new tensions between the two countries. These tensions continued to exist until the dramatic democratic changes of 1989–91 led to the collapse during this past year of the Communist system and opened the way for an unprecedented new friendship between the United States and Russia, as well as the other new nations of the former Soviet Union.

After the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, the ensuing Civil War produced acute food shortages in southwestern Russia. Wartime devastation was compounded by two successive seasons of drought, and by 1920 it was clear that a full-scale famine was under way in the Volga River Valley, Crimea, Ukraine, and Armenia. Conditions were so desperate that in early 1920 the Soviet government sent out a worldwide appeal for food aid to avert the starvation of millions of people.

Several volunteer groups in the United States and Europe had by then organized relief programs, but it became clear that help was needed on a larger scale because an estimated 10 to 20 million lives were at stake. Although it had not officially recognized the Soviet regime, the United States government was pressed from many sides to intervene, and in August 1920 an informal agreement was negotiated to begin a famine relief program. In 1921 President Warren Harding appointed Herbert Hoover, then secretary of commerce, to organize the relief effort.

Congress authorized $20 million, and Hoover proceeded to organize the American Relief Administration (ARA) to do the job. Under Hoover's terms, the ARA was to be a completely American-run relief program for the transport, storage, and delivery of relief supplies (mainly food and seed grain) to those in the famine region. After Soviet officials agreed, hundreds of American volunteers were dispatched to oversee the program. The ARA gradually earned the trust of the local Communist authorities and was given a virtually free hand to distribute thousands of tons of grain, as well as clothing and medical supplies. This remarkable humanitarian effort was credited with saving many millions of lives.

ARA aid continued into 1923, by which time local farms were again producing and the famine's grip was broken. Hoover and his ARA were later honored by the Soviet government for the care and generosity that the United States had shown in this desperate crisis.Answer:

6 0

3 years ago

11.what error did the Japanese make in their attack on Pearl Harbor and how did this harm their ultimate military strategy?

mina [271]

Answer:

Their goal was to destroy the military base at Pearl Harbor. While major destruction was inflicted onto the Pacific fleet, it would not do as much damage as the Japanese would plan to do. Ultimately this would allow for a speedier recovery of the Pearl Harbor base and allow the United States to maintain a good control of the island of Hawaii.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

The Holocaust was considered what to the so called "Jewish question"?

nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

Final Solution

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

RSB [31]

They both made their own items of clothing

5 0

3 years ago