All categories

3 years ago

How did The Aryans change India (3 ways) sorry I'm so dumb

Social Studies

2 answers:

Otrada [13]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Aryan is a designation originally meaning “civilized”, “noble”, or “free” without reference to any ethnicity. It was first applied as a self-identifying term by a migratory group of people from Central Asia later known as Indo-Iranians (who settled on the Iranian Plateau) and, later, applied to Indo-Aryans (who traveled south to settle northern India). The word had no widespread ethnic connotation prior to the 19th century CE other than its usage by the Persians (known as 'Iranians' from 'Aryans') to distinguish themselves from their Muslim Arab conquerors in the 7th century CE, and even then (it could be argued) it was not so much an ethnic distinction as one of class and personhood. Prior to the conquest, Persia had been “the land of the Aryans” and, afterwards, a term was coined for non-Aryans.

'Aryan' became associated with ethnicity and, especially, with light-skinned (Caucasian) superiority, only after Western European scholars began translating, and often misinterpreting, Sanskrit texts in the 18th and more extensively in the 19th centuries CE. Theories had been advanced earlier regarding a correlation between Sanskrit and European languages, but this concept was popularized by the Anglo-Welsh philologist Sir William Jones (l. 1746-1794 CE) in 1786 CE who claimed there was a common source for these languages which he called Proto-Indo-European.

Explanation:

Answers are stated in paragrapg 2

Aleonysh [2.5K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer: The Aryans introduced cultural diffusion to India, by introducing their language, religious beliefs, and social system. This had a long lasting impact on India.

***If you found my answer helpful, please give me the brainliest. :) ***

You might be interested in

Can anyone help me in this I kinda don’t k how to do it pls help me pls begging u

KengaRu [80]

Hey there! Here it is finally working again! Haha!

For The Discussion...

Box #1 : The weakness of the Articles of Confederation was that Congress was not strong enough to enforce laws or raise taxes, making it difficult for the new nation to repay their debts for the Revolutionary war.

Box #2 : During the time at which the articles of confederation were created, the whole independent system of government was new. USA had just gained independence from Britain meaning the leaders did not understand how to fully operate a country. Thus, these articles were created with a fairly weak central government.

Box #3 : first form of government.

states right

union between states and higher attorney

Box #4 : I don't know this one. I am sorry!!!

Box #5 : I can't really answer this for you. It is asking for your opinion. I can't give you mine other wise I would get you expelled from your school. I am a very...well I give off very informal answers that will get you and your parents into a lot of trouble with this school you are attending. Again, I am sorry.

#1. C.

#2. C.

#3. C.

All of the multipl choices are obviously C.

Hope this helps. Sorry for the last two parts of the discussion. I didn't know the fourth and the fifth, I couldn't give off my opinion or else, like I said, your parents would get into trouble with the school and you could get into trouble because of me. But, I hope this helps you out. if not, I am so sorry!!! I do have to go. So, good night, sleep well and I will be on maybe tomorrow. Depends on how life goes for me. Byeee!

-Karleif Elhaz Hugo Westsson-Jonsi-

4 0

4 years ago

What sequence of events led to Augustus becoming romes first emperor

marta [7]

Answer:

Explanati-civil war broke out with several Roman leaders struggling to gain power (Octavian, Caesar's grand-nephew and adopted son was one of them)

-after years of war, Octavian won and became ruler

-He took the name of Augustus ("exalted one") and became Rome's first emperor.on:

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What incompatible goals do you and your relational partner(s) seek?

Scrat [10]

I will be discussing my relationship with a friend and what dialectical tensions we faced altogether. So, when I first met this friend, he was a complete stranger to me and we met in a local market accidentally where our shopping bags got exchanged. We met officially to exchange bags and then got to know each other in a formal discussion. Soon, that bonding developed but there was still uncertainty about this bond

(Predictability/novelty). There was some bizarre tension in my mind to ask him out to meet again but then again it was a kind of some uncomfortable pull that didn't let me do it. When I got to know him better I soon realized that he was too open about his things and experiences and I could not be open the same way about my life(Openness/closeness). Another tension suddenly which we faced was to connect properly and that too how to maintain a bond since we shared quite a bunch of things such as the interest in similar books, TV shows, etc (Autonomy/connectedness).

Learn more about relationships here

brainly.com/question/10286547

#SPJ4

4 0

2 years ago

Please answer the question correctly with factual information for brainliest.

Sphinxa [80]

Answer:

The Monroe Doctrine was to prevent further European colonization in the Western Hemisphere.

Explanation:

Monroe Doctrine, (December 2, 1823), cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy enunciated by Pres. James Monroe in his annual message to Congress. Declaring that the Old World and New World had different systems and must remain distinct spheres, Monroe made four basic points: (1) the United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between European powers; (2) the United States recognized and would not interfere with existing colonies and dependencies in the Western Hemisphere; (3) the Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization; and (4) any attempt by a European power to oppress or control any nation in the Western Hemisphere would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.

In declaring separate spheres of influence and a policy of non-intervention in the foreign affairs of Europe, the Monroe Doctrine drew on past statements of American diplomatic ideals, including George Washington’s Farewell Address in 1796, and James Madison’s declaration of war with Britain in 1812.

4 0

3 years ago

According to adam smith's invisible hand principle, productive actions that promote the general welfare of society will be under

choli [55]

Adam Smith theories promote individualism in the sense that they state that, when each economic agent (households, business, or public entities) pursue their own interests selfishly, the outcomes generated by their economic activities will optimize the social welfare.

The incentives behind working for the own profit are much higher, and make individuals more productive and more sensitive to mistakes, therefore they are keen on improving their practices constantly. In turn, the incentives of working for the common interest are more vague, and such situations lead to sharp productivity declines. It is more likely that societies with greater productivity are able to produce efficiently enough goods and services to cover the needs of all its citizens. Therefore those societies end up maximizing the social welfare. These are the main arguments which support the invisible hand principle coined by Adam Smith.

4 0

3 years ago