To get more land and start a new life
they mostly established an federal government
This is the kind of concept a utilitarian would agree on. If the result is positive for a large group of people, we should seriously consider doing it.
However, I would like to comment on this concept. In my opinion (and that's what you're asking for) there are situations in which the ends don't justify the means. You can e.g. think about mass-bombings to fight against terrorism. However, the possibility exists that innocent people will be hit, and will die. Therefore, the end don't always justify the means (in my opinion).
Answer:
Protection
Explanation:
In relational Dialectics focus is on the dynamic tensions, operating in relationships.
Here Relationships are not linear, nor stage-like, Instead it is a process of contradiction pulling us in different directions.
Dialectics are managed through communication.
Openness and protection are types of internal relational dialetics. They are focused on an important relational tensions that shows our conflicting desires to tell our secrets and to keep them hidden.
Here we are having conflicting desire whether to divulge our secret or to keep it to ourselves.
Bill's family focused on discussing only issues that are safein nature and avoiding meddling or talking about sensitive topics and issues is an example of protection focus.
<span>One of the qualities that new techniques in understanding brain sensory outcomes can be viewed in the analysis of observations in regards to what the test subject is experiencing, which is similar to how their brain may react to a given stressor or trigger.</span>
