The correct answer for the first question: The lama is looking for "The River of the Arrow" because would be option 1. "He thinks he will be purified spiritually when he finds it". This is showed in the excerpt when the lama says "By it one attains freedom from the Wheel of things", meaning he wants to be free of his sins and thinks the river is going to help him achieve it. He does not give a reference as to god being the reason he wants to find the river therefore options 2,3 and 4 are incorrect.
The correct answer for the second question: The excerpt shows that would be option 3. "Kim is eager to show the lama he does not know where the river is located". This is shown in the excerpt when he repeatedly says that he does not know the location, for example " If I knew, think you I would not cry it aloud?". Option 1, 2 and 4 are incorrect because Kim does not appear under the lama's spell, he does listen to him, and has not expressed an interest in the river's powers.
The way Telemachus upset his mother when he left to go find his father was D) Penelope's attention had been on her husband, Ulysses, and, so, Telemachus's abrupt departure without telling her shocked and distressed her.
<h3>Who is Telemachus?</h3>
He is the son of King Odysseus of Ithaca, Greece. He hates the suitors who besieged their house, drinking their wine and eating their food.
Hence, we can see that when his father is delayed from returning. he left abruptly and this upset his mother.
Read more about Telemachus here:
brainly.com/question/3388840
#SPJ1
Answer:
B, <em>Arguments are like contests.</em>
In, text provided it says "I’ve never <u>won</u> an <u>argument</u>"
He/She says "won" which would mean she or he thinks it as a competition or contest.
So, The answer would be B
Hope this helps
Answer by
Answer:
<h3>This advancement would no doubt firstly give many people to live longer on earth.</h3>
Explanation:
- The ability to slow or even stop aging would be the a breakthrough discovery in the history of mankind. Though humans have vast and endless potential, aspirations, and desires, time and age is always limited.
- Therefore, many scientist and other professionals are trying to discover a way to sustain and prolong human lives. If such discovery is made, there would be both pros and cons in this advancement.
- This advancement would no doubt firstly help people to live longer on earth. People would be able to achieve their desires and aspirations without being worried of getting old. People would also be able to spend time more time and years with their loved ones.
- However, this advancement could be dangerous in some ways. The earth will get populated rapidly as people won't die of old age. Thereby disrupting the cycle of life on earth. There will be fight for resources and position on earth. People would hold their positions and resources for a longer period of time denying opportunity to many.
- No, science should not continue to pursue this research because it would disrupt the natural cycle of life on earth.
